Case 1303723/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Shephard v RAPID Environmental Pest Control Solutions Ltd ( In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1303723/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Shephard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £591.94 net. It also recorded that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,479.85.
The tribunal further stated that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,660. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £1,561.81.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a compensatory sum of £350 described as loss of statutory rights. The total of the sums recorded in the judgment is £5,643.60. The extracted text sets out the outcomes and amounts but does not give further reasoning beyond the Rule 21 judgment format.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages; net sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £592 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,480 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,660 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement; sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,562 |
| Unfair dismissal | Compensatory award described as loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,644
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £350
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.