Case 1303725/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Turay v Tudor Views Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303725/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kight Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Turay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham by CVP on 22 and 23 June 2023 before Employment Judge Kight. The tribunal recorded that the correct name of the respondent was Tudor Views Limited, not Croner Management Hamilton Court. The only substantive claim identified in the written judgment was unfair dismissal.
The tribunal found that Mr M Turay was not dismissed. On that basis, his complaint of unfair dismissal failed. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment was issued orally at the hearing with no written reasons provided unless separately requested.
The decision does not record any discrimination, whistleblowing, redundancy, wages, or contract claims, and it does not set out any monetary findings. The published record is confined to the dismissal finding and the respondent name correction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed, so the unfair dismissal complaint failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.