Case 1303736/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr A Chisholm v Dr S Gill and Dr A Thomas (a partnership) trading as Griffiths Practice Heard: By Cloud Video Platform – Midlands West — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303736/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr A Chisholm
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Faulkner sitting alone on 1 March 2024. The claimant, Dr A Chisholm, was represented in person and the respondents were represented by Mrs M Peckham, solicitor. The hearing concerned time limit issues in pregnancy discrimination complaints.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination relating to the respondent's decision to refer the claimant to the General Medical Council on 14 April 2022 was brought out of time, but that it was presented within such further period as was just and equitable. The merits of the complaint were not decided. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.