Case 1303741/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Miss. Nije — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303741/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Mariana Njie Limited trading as M & N Healthcare from 25 April 2022 to 3 June 2022 as an office care co-ordinator. She brought a claim for arrears of pay. The parties disagreed about the hours worked and the amount due: the claimant advanced a lower figure at the hearing, while the respondent calculated that £1,620 gross was owed for hours worked.
The respondent said it was entitled to set off a car loan against wages, and referred to an unsigned contract and to items it said were still owed to it. The tribunal found that there was no signed contract of employment and no signed agreement or written consent allowing the loan to be deducted from wages. It also noted that the ET3 did not include a counterclaim, so it could not determine any loan claim in those proceedings.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the respondent was not entitled to withhold wages in the absence of a contractual term or written consent. It accepted the respondent's calculation of the unpaid wages and awarded the claimant £1,620 gross for arrears of pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for arrears of pay under section 13 ERA 1996. The ET1 originally pleaded £2,245 gross, and the claimant's hearing breakdown totalled £1,212 gross, but the tribunal accepted the respondent's calculation that £1,620 gross was due. The tribunal found no signed contract or written consent permitting set-off of the car loan, and there was no counterclaim for the loan debt. | Upheld | — | £1,620 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,620
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.