Case 1303746/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Mr P Cunningham (Legal representative) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303746/2018
- Decision date
- 5 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Newcastle-under-Lyme on 3 January 2019, Employment Judge Gaskell recorded that paragraphs 1 and 2 were made by consent of the parties. The claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was held to be well-founded and attracted an award of £44 gross. The claimant's claim for unpaid notice pay was also held to be well-founded and attracted an award of £957 gross. The tribunal noted that appropriate deductions should be made and paid to HMRC in relation to those sums.
The tribunal also awarded damages for breach of contract in the sum of £638. The total award recorded by the judgment was £1,639.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim was recorded as well-founded and paragraph 1 was made by consent of the parties; the award was £44 gross. | Settled | — | £44 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's unpaid notice pay claim was recorded as well-founded and paragraph 2 was made by consent of the parties; the award was £957 gross. | Settled | — | £957 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded damages for breach of contract in the sum of £638. | Upheld | — | £638 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,639
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.