Case 1303746/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Dykes ( claimant’s mother) For the v Dr M Salim (director) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303746/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Note
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Dykes ( claimant’s mother) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay Mr T Dykes in lieu of his accrued and untaken holiday entitlement, contrary to section 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered the Respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £608.25.
The claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal was dismissed. The Tribunal recorded that he had been paid in lieu of his one week's entitlement to statutory notice, so there was no wrongful dismissal award.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent failed to issue a Statement of Employment Particulars in breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, it ordered the Respondent to pay the claimant four weeks' pay in the gross sum of £2,000.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued and untaken holiday entitlement under section 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £608 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant was paid in lieu of his one week's entitlement to statutory notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Tribunal found a breach of s 1 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to issue a Statement of Employment Particulars and ordered a payment under s38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,608
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.