Case 1303757/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr R Carter, advocate — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303757/2018
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Birmingham on 20, 21 and 24 February 2020 before Employment Judge Dean sitting alone. The claimant, Mr M Murphy, appeared in person and the respondent, Crescent Industrial Limited, was represented by Mr R Carter, advocate.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It found that he was not dismissed by the respondent unfairly or at all.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint about pay. It found that the respondent had made no unlawful unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay. The judgment records that all of the claimant's complaints were dismissed and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent unfairly or at all. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made no unlawful unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.