Case 1303770/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr S. Gittins — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303770/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing held in public in Birmingham on 11 August 2023 before Employment Judge Gaskell. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Asda Stores Limited.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant’s race discrimination claim was also dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would follow unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction under section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.