Case 1303771/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Srawn v RSM Pharma Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1303771/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Srawn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 1303771/2018 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mrs A Srawn. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the judgment does not set out any reasons beyond the withdrawal.
The document does not provide a breakdown of the pleaded claims or any remedy determination. It is therefore recorded as a withdrawal outcome rather than a merits decision, with no monetary award stated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately set out findings on this claim type. Claim type taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately set out findings on this claim type. Claim type taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not separately set out findings on this claim type. Claim type taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.