Case 1303771/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gerrard v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303771/2022
- Decision date
- 7 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gerrard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered applications by the claimant to amend his claim. It refused the application to add a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal.
The tribunal granted the application to add complaints of direct discrimination because of sex and indirect sexual orientation discrimination. The judgment then recorded that all claims were struck out under Rule 37. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend the claim to include a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal; the complaint was not determined on its merits. | Other | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal granted the application to amend to include direct discrimination because of sex, then stated that all claims were struck out under Rule 37. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The tribunal granted the application to amend to include indirect sexual orientation discrimination, then stated that all claims were struck out under Rule 37. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.