Case 1303773/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hafeez Ahmed v Department for Work and Pensions — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303773/2022
- Decision date
- 29 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Hafeez Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing concerned claim 7, claim number 1303773/2022, and related applications in claim 3, claim number 1801971/2019. Claim 7 alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to the claimant accessing the 2022 Employee Deal while only being required to work his current working pattern. The claimant also applied to amend claim 7 to add a claim for discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010.
The Tribunal compared claim 7 with findings made in the claimant's fifth claim, which had considered the Employee Deal, the claimant's disability-related concerns about working patterns, and the mechanisms under the Deal for considering individual circumstances and challenging disproportionate impact. It found that the substance of claim 7 and the proposed amendment concerned the same underlying factual issue about the claimant's working pattern requirements, even though the later claim related to a further opportunity to join the Employee Deal.
The Tribunal held that the relevant issues had already been determined and that issue estoppel applied. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear claim 7 and no jurisdiction to consider the application to amend it. The claimant's application to strike out the respondent's responses to claims 3 and 7 was refused; the Tribunal found it was neither abusive nor unreasonable for the respondent to change position and seek a preliminary hearing after the amendment application. Claim 3 was to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim 7 was a failure to make reasonable adjustments claim concerning access to the 2022 Employee Deal while retaining the claimant's current working pattern. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was barred by issue estoppel. The claimant's proposed amendment to add a s 15 Equality Act 2010 discrimination arising from disability claim was not considered because the Tribunal also held it lacked jurisdiction to consider the amendment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- res judicata
- cause of action estoppel
- issue estoppel
- Henderson v Henderson
- abuse of process
- Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited v Zodiac Seats UK Limited
- Johnson v Gore-Wood & Co
- Foster v Bon Groundwork Ltd
- s 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.