Case 1303782/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Duane, Counsel For the v Mr Soanes, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303782/2019
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
- Panel members
- Dr G Hammersley, Mrs R Pelter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Duane, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Birmingham on 27 to 30 July 2020, before Employment Judge Hughes with members Dr G Hammersley and Mrs R Pelter, the tribunal considered Mrs S Tomkinson's claims against Emirates. The tribunal's unanimous decision, promulgated on 3 August 2020, was that the claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. Those claims were indirect sex discrimination, victimisation, constructive unfair dismissal, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text. The judgment also states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would follow when time permitted.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim was expressly described as breach of contract in respect of notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.