Case 1303796/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lancaster v Mr Crichton Miller — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303796/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lancaster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 October 2019, the tribunal gave Mr R Lancaster an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings were made, and no monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out decision only. The extracted text does not specify the underlying substantive cause of action beyond the case listing, so the claim is recorded here as other.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.