Case 1303811/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Fox v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303811/2019
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Ms S Campbell, Mrs N Chavda
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Fox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham over six days from 21 September to 28 September 2020 before Employment Judge Mark Butler, sitting with Ms S Campbell and Mrs N Chavda.
The tribunal dismissed the claims for direct disability discrimination and victimisation. It upheld the claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination, and unfair dismissal.
No remedy was determined in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the matter would proceed to a remedy hearing, with directions to follow separately.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not give further detail beyond listing it alongside disability discrimination claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination succeeded. The judgment does not separately state the protected characteristic in this short judgment, but the listed claims are disability discrimination claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.