Case 1303838/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bosley v Brighton-Best International (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303838/2023
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- By CVP at Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bosley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for direct disability discrimination against Brighton-Best International (UK) Limited. The tribunal held that, at the relevant times between December 2021 and December 2022, Mr P Bosley was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of PTSD and/or disassociation disorder.
On that basis, the complaint of direct disability discrimination was dismissed. The judgment is a short no-hearing decision under rule 60 and does not record any monetary remedy or further factual findings beyond the disability status point and the resulting dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that at the relevant times, December 2021 to December 2022, the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of PTSD and/or disassociation disorder. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.