Case 1303845/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs S Bellamy (2) Miss Z Ahkter v Top Technology Energy Savers Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303845/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs S Bellamy (2) Miss Z Ahkter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham on 11 March 2019 before Employment Judge Kelly, with both claimants appearing in person and no appearance for the respondent. The tribunal upheld the claims brought by Mrs S Bellamy and Miss Z Ahkter against Top Technology Energy Savers Ltd. The judgment records that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the wages of each claimant and failed to pay compensation for accrued leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
For the first claimant, the tribunal accepted the unpaid sums identified in her 30 May 2018 email: pay due on 19 April 2018, 19 May 2018, and for 21-23 May 2018. It also awarded statutory sick pay from 24 May 2018 to termination on 22 June 2018, discounting four waiting days. The tribunal then added an uplift of four weeks' pay for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment, calculated on the basis of a week's pay of £240.
For the first claimant's holiday claim, the tribunal found that the leave year started on 19 July 2017 and ended on 22 June 2018, that 93% of the leave year had expired by termination, and that 26 days were due for that period. After crediting 14 days taken, it found a balance of 12 days and awarded £576 at a daily rate of £48. For the second claimant, the tribunal accepted the unpaid sums set out in her 30 May 2018 email and the further period from 9 April 2018 to termination on 19 June 2018, calculated at 40 hours per week at £8 per hour, less 2 days' pay.
The second claimant's holiday claim was also upheld. The tribunal found that her leave year started on 26 March 2018, that 24% of the leave year had expired by termination on 19 June 2018, and that 7 days were due for that period. After crediting 3 days taken, it found a balance of 4 days and awarded £256 at a daily rate of £64. The total award recorded in the judgment was £8,572.20.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. Tribunal calculated £1,428 due on 19 April 2018, £1,160 due on 19 May 2018, £152 for 21-23 May 2018, £368.20 statutory sick pay for 24 May 2018 to termination on 22 June 2018, and a £960 uplift for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £4,068 |
| Working time regulations | First claimant. Compensation under Reg 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for untaken leave on termination, calculated as 12 days at a daily rate of £48. | Upheld | — | £576 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant. Tribunal calculated £472 for 26 March 2018 to 8 April 2018, and £3,200 for 9 April 2018 to termination on 19 June 2018, less 2 days' pay, giving £3,672. | Upheld | — | £3,672 |
| Working time regulations | Second claimant. Compensation under Reg 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for untaken leave on termination, calculated as 4 days at a daily rate of £64. | Upheld | — | £256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,572
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.