Case 1303852/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Lewis v Lanyon Bowdlers Solicitors LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303852/2019
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr S Woodall, Dr Hammersley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a consent judgment in Mrs S Lewis v Lanyon Bowdlers Solicitors LLP. It records a hearing at Birmingham Employment Tribunal by CVP on 21, 22 and 23 September 2020 before Employment Judge Cookson sitting with Mr S Woodall and Dr Hammersley, with Mr F Currie appearing for the claimant and Mr R Powell for the respondent.
By consent, the hearing was adjourned for 28 days and the parties were given liberty to apply within that period. The judgment states that, if no application was made, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed with effect from that date. The extracted text does not contain any substantive findings on liability, any legal tests applied, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Consent judgment recorded that the hearing was adjourned for 28 days with liberty to apply; if no application was made within that period, the claim would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed. The extracted text does not record any merits findings. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.