Case 1303857/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Threlfall v Nicholl Food Packaging Limited (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303857/2019
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Murdin Date
- Venue
- Employment Tribunal Services
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Threlfall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge L Murdin Date, sitting at Employment Tribunal Services on 16 February 2022, issued a short judgment in Mr J Threlfall's claim against Nicholl Food Packaging Limited (in liquidation). The extracted text records the awards made, but it does not set out the underlying liability reasoning or factual findings that led to them.
The tribunal awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights, £438.29 for holiday pay, £11,890.11 for unlawful deduction of wages, a basic award of £6,825, a compensatory award of £86,444, £4,024.97 for loss of pension contributions, and £1,595.37 for loss of private health care. The total award recorded in the judgment was £111,717.74.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a basic award of £6,825 and a compensatory award of £86,444, plus separate line items for loss of statutory rights (£500), loss of pension contributions (£4,024.97) and loss of private health care (£1,595.37). The extracted text does not set out the liability reasoning. | Upheld | — | £99,389 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded separately as unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £11,890 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded separately as loss of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £438 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £111,718
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,825
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £86,444
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.