Case 1303902/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Gooden v Alliance in Partnership — 2026
- Case reference
- 1303902/2025
- Decision date
- 25 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Gooden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Gooden's claim against Alliance in Partnership Limited was dismissed because she failed to attend the hearing on 25 August 2026. The hearing took place at Birmingham remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Dimbylow. The claimant was neither present nor represented; Ms A Baldwin, solicitor, represented the respondent.
The judge considered the available information and made enquiries by telephone and email about the reasons for the claimant's absence before dismissing the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type or record findings on its merits. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type or any protected characteristic. The claim was dismissed for non-attendance under Rule 47. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.