Case 1303919/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Nijhawan v E.On UK plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303919/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs L Shenton, Mr R White
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Nijhawan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Midlands West before Employment Judge Bansal with Mrs L Shenton and Mr R White, dealt with competing strike-out applications rather than the substantive merits of the underlying case. The claimant's application to strike out the response under rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 was dismissed, and the respondent's application to strike out the claim under rule 37(1)(b),(c)&(e) of the same Rules was also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claimant's application for strike out of the response under rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for strike out of the claim under rule 37(1)(b),(c)&(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- rule 37(1)(b),(c)&(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
- rule 71(1) of the Employment Tribunals of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.