Case 1303923/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance For the v Ms E Mayhew-Hills (consultant) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303923/2023
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 10 December 2024 in Birmingham before Employment Judge Perry, with no appearance for the claimant and Ms E Mayhew-Hills appearing for the respondent, the tribunal considered which complaints remained live. Because the claimant had failed to confirm whether any other complaints were being pursued, the tribunal directed that the complaints to be heard at trial would be the claimant’s holiday pay complaint and notice pay complaint.
The judgment does not make any merits findings on the holiday pay or notice pay complaints. It records only that any other complaints were dismissed, and it makes no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint was identified as one of the claims to be heard at trial. The judgment does not record a merits determination on this complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay complaint was identified as one of the claims to be heard at trial. The judgment does not record a merits determination on this complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Any other complaints were dismissed because the claimant failed to confirm whether they were still pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.