Case 1303929/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Stokes v Royal Mail Group Ltd UPON APPLICATION made by email dated 18 June 2023 to reconsider the — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303929/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Battisby Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Stokes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with an application made by email on 18 June 2023 for reconsideration under rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and did so without a hearing. It recorded that the earlier judgment striking out the claim was revoked.
The extracted text contains no substantive findings on the underlying employment claims and no award or other remedy. It also contains an internal date inconsistency, referring in the opening sentence to a judgment dated 31 May 2023 and in the operative part to a judgment dated 31 May 2024 striking out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 71 reconsideration application decided without a hearing. The tribunal revoked the earlier judgment striking out the claim. The extracted text does not record any substantive liability findings or any remedy. The text refers to the strike-out judgment as dated 31 May 2024, while the opening sentence refers to reconsideration of a judgment dated 31 May 2023. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.