Case 1303943/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Kuzma v Swish A Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303943/2023
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Kuzma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Kuzma brought a complaint against Swish A Ltd for unlawful deductions from wages. The hearing was held at Birmingham Employment Tribunal by CVP on 6 November 2023 before Employment Judge Martin, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance or representation for the respondent.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £7,893.40. The extracted reasons state only that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons could be requested within fourteen days; no further factual or legal reasoning is included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was well founded and orders payment of £7,893.40. The remedy is not separately split further in the text. | Upheld | — | £7,893 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,893
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.