Case 1303973/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Harjit Singh v Ramgarhia Gurdwara Small Heath and 15 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 1303973/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Harjit Singh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form dated 4 May 2023 brought complaints of unlawful deductions from wages, failure to pay national minimum wage, holiday pay and notice pay arising from the claimant's work as a Sikh priest at the respondent's Gurdwara. The original July 2024 dismissal followed a letter from the claimant's lay representative stating that the claimant had withdrawn the claim. The claimant later said that withdrawal had not been authorised by him and sought reconsideration.
At the reconsideration hearing on 9 May 2025, Employment Judge Wedderspoon accepted that the withdrawal letter of 5 July 2024 was clear, unequivocal and unambiguous, so the tribunal had no duty at that stage to investigate further whether a valid withdrawal had been made. The tribunal nevertheless applied the rule 51 interests of justice test, including the authorities cited by the parties, and found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant intended to continue his claim, had not authorised his lay representative to withdraw it, and had not had the opportunity for his case to be heard on the merits.
The tribunal took into account the claimant's attendance at tribunal on 8 July 2024, his complaint to the clerk that he had not given authority for the withdrawal, and the later witness evidence and supporting documents showing a payment of £176 to the representative, a hotel booking of £258.50 and a coach ticket of £23.10. It also noted that the respondent had no positive case on the claimant's allegations against the lay representative. The dismissal judgment of 9 July 2024, and the refusal to reconsider on 30 July 2024, were set aside, but the final order was that the claimant's claim remained withdrawn and there was no merits determination or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Original claim form included unlawful deductions from wages. The reconsideration judgment revoked the dismissal order, but the claim remained withdrawn and was not determined on the merits. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | National minimum wage complaint referred to in the claim form. No separate merits determination was made; the claim remained withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint referred to in the claim form. No separate merits determination was made; the claim remained withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint referred to in the claim form. No separate merits determination was made; the claim remained withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- clear, unequivocal and unambiguous withdrawal
- Rule 51 interests of justice
- Segor v Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited
- Drysdale v Department of Transport
- Campbell v OCS Group
- Phipps v Primary Education Services Limited
- Outasight VB Limited v Brown
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.