Case 1303989/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Allen v Holdcroft Renault Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303989/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Allen brought claims for wrongful dismissal and holiday pay against Holdcroft Renault Ltd arising out of the end of his short employment as a Sales Executive, which began on 4 January 2023. The tribunal found that he had an entitlement in principle to one week's contractual notice, but that the respondent dismissed him without notice at the end of the meeting on 1 March 2023, rather than on 22 March 2023 as he had contended.
On the wrongful dismissal claim, the tribunal accepted the evidence of Mr Rammell on the central issue and found that Mr Allen had passed his own bank details to customers of the respondent on two occasions so that he could obtain funds for himself. The tribunal held that this conduct was dishonest and serious, and that it amounted to a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. It also found that the separate allegation that he used customer credit card details to set up gambling website accounts was not proved on the evidence before it.
The holiday pay claim succeeded. The respondent accepted liability in principle, and the only issue was quantum. The tribunal found that the leave year followed the calendar year, that Mr Allen had taken no annual leave, and that by 1 March 2023 he had accrued 2.33 days' leave, which rounded up under the Working Time Regulations to 2.5 days. It rejected the respondent's two-day figure and the claimant's six-day case, and ordered the respondent to pay £161.05 gross, calculated at the agreed daily rate of £64.42.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that Holdcroft Renault Ltd was entitled to summarily dismiss Mr D Allen without notice because he had, on two occasions, passed his own bank details to customers in place of the respondent's details in order to obtain funds for himself. The separate allegation that he used customer credit card details to set up gambling website accounts was not proved. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal accepted that Mr D Allen had accrued 2.5 days' untaken holiday at the termination date and rejected both the respondent's two-day figure and the claimant's six-day case. The award was calculated at the agreed gross daily rate of £64.42. | Upheld | — | £161 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £161
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- fundamental breach of contract
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
- reg.14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- reg.15A(2A) and reg.15A(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.