Case 1304009/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dean Holtham v R1 Birmingham City Football Club Community Trust R2 Birmingham City Football Club plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304009/2017
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dean Holtham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Butler issued a corrected judgment on 19 April 2021 under Rule 69. The correction addresses an accidental slip or clerical error in the earlier judgment of 28 February 2018, which had been entered against the wrong case number.
The corrected judgment states that the First Respondent's counterclaim against Mr Dean Holtham is dismissed in case number 1304009/2017, rather than 1302028/2017 as recorded in the earlier judgment. The reasons section makes clear that this document is confined to correcting the case number error and does not revisit the underlying merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The corrected judgment records that the First Respondent's counterclaim against the claimant was dismissed. It is a Rule 69 correction of an earlier judgment and does not set out substantive merits reasoning in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.