Case 1304079/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Appadoo v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304079/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Appadoo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe corrected preliminary hearing judgment records that the claimant's complaint of indirect religious discrimination was dismissed because it had been presented after the expiry of the statutory time limit. The tribunal found that it was not just and equitable for that time limit to be extended.
The reasons explain that the original judgment sent to the parties on 29 October 2019 had accidentally referred to indirect sex discrimination, and that this should have referred to indirect religious discrimination. Judgment had been given orally at the hearing on 17 October 2019 dismissing the indirect religious discrimination complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment describes the complaint as indirect religious discrimination and dismisses it as presented out of time; it states it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- statutory time limit
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.