Case 1304091/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Haider v Arun Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304091/2018
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Haider
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the dispute, and the judgment does not record any liability determination, remedy hearing, or monetary award.
The case listing context identifies the claims as unfair dismissal and race discrimination, but the short judgment itself does not set out the factual background or any legal analysis. The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal by the claimant on 3 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the short judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The race discrimination claim type is taken from the case listing context rather than the short judgment text. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.