Case 1304108/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Hayward v Milk & Cookies Childcare Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304108/2018
- Decision date
- 19 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Hayward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Connolly, sitting alone in Birmingham on 19 June 2019, found that Milk & Cookies Childcare Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Ms C Hayward’s wages. The tribunal also found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract by failing to pay the wages due under it.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms Hayward the gross sum of £1,295.73. The judgment states that this amount comprised outstanding wages and damages for failure to pay outstanding wages. It also records that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The monetary award was not split between this claim and the breach of contract finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract by failing to pay wages due under it. The tribunal made a single gross award covering outstanding wages and damages, rather than a separate figure for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,296
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.