Case 1304146/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Miah (in person) For the v Mr I Aimufua (litigation consultant) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304146/2023
- Decision date
- 7 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Miah (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public in person on 7 April 2025, before Employment Judge Perry, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal and a wages complaint. The claimant, Mr W Miah, appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Mr I Aimufua, litigation consultant.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. The judgment gives no further findings on liability for that claim beyond the dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent conceded that the wages complaint was well founded; the order was for payment of £782.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £782 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £782
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.