Case 1304167/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Mansell v Goodwin Steel Castings Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304167/2021
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Hussain Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Mansell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Mr G Mansell’s unfair dismissal claim against Goodwin Steel Castings Ltd was not well founded, so that claim was dismissed. The record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons were provided in the written record unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract because it failed to pay for a course in accordance with the Training Agreement. On that claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £7,086 directly as damages for the breach of contract, with payment due within 28 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay for a course in accordance with the Training Agreement and ordered damages of £7,086 payable directly to the claimant within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £7,086 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,086
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.