Case 1304174/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cooper First v The Secretary of State for Business and Trade Second Respondent: Revard Group Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304174/2024
- Decision date
- 30 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cooper First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Midlands West by CVP on 30 May 2025 before Employment Judge Kelly sitting alone, recorded that Mr R Cooper appeared in person, the first respondent was represented by Miss Ware, and there was no attendance for the second respondent. The written judgment states that the claimant was an employee of the second respondent from 3 September 2018 until 16 February 2024.
No monetary award or further claim-specific outcome is set out in the extracted judgment text. The decision record is limited to the employment-status finding and includes a note that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records only a finding that the claimant was an employee of the second respondent from 3 September 2018 until 16 February 2024. No separate statutory claim type, monetary award, or dismissal is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.