Case 1304185/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Patel v Bitco Med Limited Heard: by CVP in Birmingham — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304185/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Patel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Patel brought a claim against Bitco Med Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages. Employment Judge Codd, sitting in Birmingham by CVP on 16 November 2023, found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by way of a series of deductions in the period November 2022 to March 2023.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £10,833.30, described as the gross sum deducted. The written record also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
The claimant also applied to amend her claim to include unpaid holiday pay, described in the judgment as out of time. That application was found not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages in the period November 2022 to March 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £10,833 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's application to amend her claim to include unpaid holiday pay, described as out of time, was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,833
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.