Case 1304185/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Farihah Chaudry, Assistant Lawyer v Simon Jerrison, Solicitor PRELIMINARY HEARING IN PUBLIC — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304185/2024
- Decision date
- 11 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Farihah Chaudry, Assistant Lawyer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 5 February 2025 before Employment Judge Walker sitting alone. The claimant, Mrs Lawson, had been employed by West Midlands Fire Service as a firefighter from 13 March 2020 until her dismissal without notice was confirmed by letter dated 8 January 2024. She presented her ET1 on 3 April 2024 alleging unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, but the discrimination aspects were later withdrawn. In August 2024 her representatives sought to amend the claim to add wrongful dismissal in respect of unpaid notice pay.
The tribunal applied the amendment authorities in Vaughan v Modality Partnership and Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore, and considered the respondent’s reliance on Chandok v Tirkey. It found that the proposed wrongful dismissal claim arose from the same factual matrix as the existing unfair dismissal claim because it was based on the respondent’s decision not to pay notice pay following dismissal for gross misconduct. The tribunal accepted that the amendment did not introduce a new factual case, but rather added a new label to matters already pleaded in the ET1 and further particulars.
The tribunal also found that the application was made promptly when the claimant’s representatives came on the record, that the respondent had notice of the application the same day, and that allowing the amendment would not alter the witness requirements or time estimate for the substantive liability hearing. Balancing the injustice and hardship to each party, the tribunal concluded that refusing the amendment would cause greater prejudice to the claimant than granting it to the respondent. The application was therefore granted, and the respondent was given leave to amend its response by 4.00 pm on 28 February 2025 if it wished to do so.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal granted the claimant leave to amend the ET1 to add a claim for wrongful dismissal in respect of unpaid notice pay. This was a preliminary amendment decision only and was not a determination of the merits of the wrongful dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Chandok v Tirkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.