Case 1304186/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304186/2024
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Approved
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held at Midlands West on 1 July 2025 before Employment Judge Harding, the claimant, Mr Kinghorne, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Allsop, Counsel. The judgment records that the case concerned claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid notice pay.
By consent, both claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any merits findings on either claim and does not identify any monetary award, liability finding, or remedy calculation.
No discrimination issues, panel members, or legal tests are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Claim for unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records that, by consent, it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid notice pay. The judgment records that, by consent, it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.