Case 1304206/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Walker v Booker Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304206/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs D Hill, Mr P Kennedy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the Respondent did not contravene section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 in relation to the Claimant's disability discrimination complaints. The dismissed complaints included alleged exclusion from social activities, comments made when the Claimant asked for help, refusal to allow text reporting for lateness or absence, a final written warning, indirect discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and discrimination arising from disability.
The Tribunal also held that the Respondent did not contravene section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 by victimising the Claimant in relation to sick pay, form SSP1, or calling the police on 12 May 2023. The unauthorised deductions from wages complaint concerning a bonus paid in May 2023 was found not well-founded, and all complaints were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismissed complaints of direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and discrimination arising from disability. Written reasons were not provided in this judgment record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment dismissed the Equality Act victimisation complaints. Written reasons were not provided in this judgment record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deductions complaint concerned a bonus paid in May 2023 and was found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 39 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.