Case 1304208/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Arun Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304208/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 23 September 2024 was originally listed as a two-day full hearing but was converted to a preliminary hearing because the case was not ready to proceed. The tribunal recorded that the parties had not complied with the case management directions dated 12 April 2024 and that no documents had been submitted by the claimant. It also noted that the respondent had produced a resignation letter and minutes of a meeting at which the claimant resigned, both signed by her, together with payslips.
After discussion with the claimant, she withdrew her claims and repeated the withdrawal when invited to confirm her position by the tribunal. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims accordingly. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not break the claims out separately; the case listing identified an unfair dismissal claim, and the tribunal dismissed the claims upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not break the claims out separately; the case listing identified a Working Time Regulations claim, and the tribunal dismissed the claims upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.