Case 1304227/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M King v JLB Shipping & Logistics Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304227/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr M King's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It recorded, however, that there would be no compensation because the outcome would have been the same if a fair procedure had been followed and/or there was 100% contributory fault by the claimant.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It also dismissed the claim for unpaid holiday pay and the claim for breach of contract. No separate monetary award was recorded for those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded, but the tribunal stated there would be no compensation because the outcome would have been the same if a fair procedure had been followed and/or there was 100% contributory fault by the claimant. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Listed in the judgment as a claim for unpaid holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.