Case 1304236/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N G Edmunds (Deceased) v Computer Solutions (Worcester) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304236/2023
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N G Edmunds (Deceased)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 30 May 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Maxwell decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £14,275. The judgment then ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total sum, although the printed total appears as £14.275.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 22 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £14,275, but the total is printed as £14.275; this appears inconsistent. | Upheld | — | £14,275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,275
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.