Case 1304276/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Clarke v Hugh M Construction Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304276/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Clarke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 22 September 2021 and heard by CVP on 1 March 2022 before Employment Judge Woffenden. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, did not attend, and was not represented, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for notice pay, arrears of pay and 'other payments'. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.
The only monetary award recorded in the judgment was £434.01 for 6.1 days of accrued but untaken holiday at a daily rate of £71.15. The judgment was dated 1 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment grouped the claimant's notice pay, arrears of pay and 'other payments' claims together and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £434.01, calculated as 6.1 days accrued but untaken holiday at a daily rate of £71.15. | Upheld | — | £434 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £434
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.