Case 1304277/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morris (solicitor) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304277/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Morris (solicitor) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 June 2020 before Employment Judge Johnson in Birmingham, the claimant was represented by Mr D Morris and the first respondent by Mr E Beevor. The judgment records that the claimant's wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the substantive issues. It recorded that the claimant's remaining claims of sex discrimination/harassment, unpaid annual leave and notice pay remained in issue and were to be determined by the tribunal.
The judgment also states that the first respondent's employer's contract claim was unaffected by this decision. No remedy was awarded in this judgment, and no reasons were issued beyond the oral decision recorded in writing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim that the first respondent had failed to pay her wages was dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims of sex discrimination/harassment, unpaid annual leave and notice pay were left in issue. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.