Case 1304282/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Khunkhuna v Verisure Services (UK) Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304282/2024
- Decision date
- 8 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Khunkhuna
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant’s only tribunal complaint was of unauthorised deductions from wages against Verisure Services (UK) Limited. The hearing was a preliminary hearing on 7 March 2025 before Employment Judge Camp sitting alone in Birmingham via CVP.
The tribunal held that the complaint was presented outside the time limit in section 23(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented within that time limit.
On that basis, the claimant’s entire claim failed and was dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint was presented outside the time limit in section 23(2)(a) ERA 1996 and was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23(2)(a) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.