Case 1304297/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Parekh v F.A. Gill Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304297/2024
- Decision date
- 25 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- By CVP at Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Parekh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Platt heard the case by CVP at Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 25 September 2024. The Claimant, Ms H Parekh, appeared in person accompanied by Mrs Millerchip; the Respondent, F.A. Gill Limited (In Administration), did not attend. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well-founded and that she was constructively unfairly dismissed. The tribunal also found the Claimant's complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay to be well-founded.
The Respondent was ordered to pay a basic award for unfair dismissal of £14,181.21, breach of contract (12 weeks' notice) of £5,021.52, a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £8,369.20 (covering 20 weeks of past losses to the date of the hearing), and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment records that these are the actual sums payable after any deductions or uplifts have been applied. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided in this record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal found the constructive unfair dismissal complaint well-founded under Rule 21 (respondent did not attend). Award comprises basic award of £14,181.21, compensatory award of £8,369.20 for 20 weeks past losses, and £500 loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £23,050 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract (notice pay) complaint well-founded; 12 weeks' notice awarded. | Upheld | — | £5,022 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £28,072
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £14,181
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,369
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.