Case 1304310/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robert Lamsdale v Kingswinford Coachways Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1304310/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge The
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robert Lamsdale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, with no response presented within the requisite time limit. On the material before Employment Judge Monk, the tribunal determined the claim without a hearing on 27 May 2020.
The tribunal upheld the claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded the claimant damages of £3,758.40 net. It also declared that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £62.64 gross.
The tribunal further held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £7,360.20. No separate findings on other heads of loss or remedy were recorded in the judgment. The total of the sums ordered is £11,181.24.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim upheld in respect of notice pay; damages awarded in the sum of £3,758.40 net. | Upheld | — | £3,758 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal declared the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £62.64 gross. | Upheld | — | £63 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £7,360.20. | Upheld | — | £7,360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,181
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.