Mr J Wootton v Sodexo Limited — 2020

Case reference: 1304329/2020
Decision date: 5 August 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Woffenden

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr J Wootton

Respondent

Sodexo Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment states that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the proceedings under rule 52.

No substantive findings on the merits of the claims, liability, or remedy are recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the disability discrimination classification comes from the listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded claims.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the unlawful deduction classification comes from the listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded claims.	Withdrawn	—	—
Working time regulations	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the working time classification comes from the listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded claims.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.