Case 1304333/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Tomkins (lay representative) For the v Mr P Whelan (lay representative) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1304333/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Tomkins (lay representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Birmingham, chaired by Employment Judge J Jones, found that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded. It also found that the claim for holiday pay succeeded, identifying 8 days' accrued unpaid leave, and that the claim to notice pay succeeded.
The judgment does not set out any monetary award because the parties had agreed terms of settlement and the issue of remedy was stayed. The tribunal stated that the matter would not be re-listed unless an application was received by 30 June 2020.
No separate legal test or detailed findings are recorded in the short judgment extract, and no split between the successful heads of claim is given. The record therefore reflects liability findings only, with remedy left unresolved by the stay following settlement.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claim succeeded for 8 days' accrued unpaid leave, but it does not state a monetary figure because remedy was stayed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded in the judgment as a successful claim to notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.