Case 1304344/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Moulder v Mr M O’Loughlin trading as Triple M Builders — 2023
- Case reference
- 1304344/2021
- Decision date
- 24 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Moulder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr L Moulder had been dismissed in breach of contract. It awarded damages of £1,126 for notice pay, made up of 4 weeks of underpayment at £81.12 per week (£324.48) and 2 weeks of unpaid notice pay at £400.76 per week (£801.52). The written record states that these figures were corrected from the oral judgment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,400. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge C Taylor sitting alone on 24 January 2023, and no other claims or remedies are recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages for notice pay. The written judgment records 4 weeks of underpayment at £81.12 per week (£324.48) and 2 weeks of unpaid notice pay at £400.76 per week (£801.52), totalling £1,126; the written record notes these figures were corrected from the oral judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,126 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,400. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,526
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.