Case 1304378/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Vocational Training Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304378/2021
- Decision date
- 13 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Nicole Molloy brought claims against Vocational Training Limited. At the hearing on 23 June 2022 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent, the tribunal found the constructive unfair dismissal claim well-founded and successful.
On remedy for that claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award calculated at £2,772. The judgment does not record any compensatory award or separate breakdown beyond the basic award.
The tribunal also found the claim for unpaid wages well-founded and successful, awarding the claimant the net sum she claimed, £2,534.08. The total award was £5,306.08, payable by 30 June 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal and awards a basic award of £2,772. | Upheld | — | £2,772 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as a claim for unpaid wages and awards the sum claimed, £2,534.08 net. | Upheld | — | £2,534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,306
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,772
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.