Case 1304417/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Shaw v Voyage 1 Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1304417/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 12 January 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued and there had been a failure to respond.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 4 February 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued and failure to respond; it does not set out separate reasons for individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued and failure to respond; it does not set out separate reasons for individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued and failure to respond; it does not set out separate reasons for individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.