Case 1304417/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I H Boliya v Fincap Operations Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304417/2023
- Decision date
- 27 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I H Boliya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. Employment Judge Childe therefore determined the claim on the papers and entered judgment in the claimant's favour on each pleaded monetary head identified in the order.
The tribunal found that Fincap Operations Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,200.23 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of £923.07 gross for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,538.42. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £424.69.
The judgment states that the sums payable are gross amounts, with the claimant responsible for any income tax and National Insurance contributions. No separate award for compensation, interest, or injury to feelings is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Redundancy | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment in the amount stated. | Upheld | — | £2,538 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £425 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,086
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.